Progress against the field
Between Glasgow 2025 and Birmingham 2025, Caitlin Tweed and Esme Nickson lost 1:01 to the field.
Over the same races everyone got 2:31 quicker, so 1:30 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
13 races · 11 events
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Doubles Open · Women54:28 PB1/1246Beat 100%
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Relay · Mixed50:101/72Beat 99%
-
Gdansk10 Oct 2026Individual Pro · Women1:01:04 PB2/143Beat 99%
-
London Olympia24 Mar 2026Doubles Pro · Women1:02:3517/314Beat 95%
-
Copenhagen13 Mar 2026Doubles Open · Women58:551/807Beat 100%
-
Katowice21 Feb 2026Individual Pro · Women1:05:4614/99Beat 86%
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Doubles Pro · Women1:01:04 PB8/339Beat 98%
-
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Doubles Open · Women1:00:042/904Beat 100%
↑ 224 days after Glasgow 2025, with Esme Nickson 1:01 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:30 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 2:31 faster for everyone, which leaves this 1:01 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:31 faster This pair1:30 faster -
Rome26 Sep 2025Doubles Pro · Women1:04:144/63Beat 94%
-
London3 May 2025Doubles Pro · Women1:01:529/233Beat 96%
-
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Doubles Open · Women1:01:346/796Beat 99%
-
Manchester24 Jan 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:04:44 PB81/733Beat 89%
-
Manchester24 Jan 2025Relay · Women1:02:357/145Beat 95%