Progress against the field
From Rome 2025 to Birmingham 2026, the field gained 2:16 on Brendan Pearson.
The clock says 2:41 faster, but the races themselves got 4:57 quicker for everyone.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Pro · Men, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
15 races · 11 events
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Individual Pro · Men59:38 PB27/693Beat 96%
↑ 234 days after Glasgow 2026 0:50 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:34 faster on the clock, and the race was 1:44 faster for everyone, so 0:50 of it was this athlete.
The fieldCompare these two →1:44 faster This athlete2:34 faster -
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Individual Open · Men59:42 PB10/1452Beat 99%
↑ 355 days after Malaga 2025 0:27 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:25 faster on the clock, yet the race was 0:52 faster for everyone, so 0:27 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →0:52 faster This athlete0:25 faster -
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Individual Pro · Men1:02:1212/140Beat 91%
↑ 119 days after Dublin 2025 1:24 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:24 behind the field: 0:31 slower on the clock, against 0:53 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →0:53 faster This athlete0:31 slower -
Manchester21 Jan 2026Relay · Men53:487/69Beat 90%
-
Manchester21 Jan 2026Doubles Pro · Men55:46 PB15/279Beat 95%
-
Dublin12 Nov 2025Individual Pro · Men1:01:4111/115Beat 90%
↑ 21 days after Birmingham 2025 0:41 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:51 faster on the clock, and the race was 1:10 faster for everyone, so 0:41 of it was this athlete.
The fieldCompare these two →1:10 faster This athlete1:51 faster -
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Individual Pro · Men1:03:3211/137Beat 92%
↑ 26 days after Rome 2025 2:23 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:23 behind the field: 1:13 slower on the clock, against 1:10 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →1:10 faster This athlete1:13 slower -
Rome26 Sep 2025Individual Pro · Men1:02:1911/276Beat 96%
-
Malaga21 Mar 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:19:49 PB418/693Beat 40%
-
Malaga21 Mar 2025Doubles Open · Men57:42 PB28/704Beat 96%
-
Malaga21 Mar 2025Individual Open · Men1:00:079/966Beat 99%
↑ 147 days after Birmingham 2024 0:21 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
4:58 faster on the clock, yet the race was 5:19 faster for everyone, so 0:21 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →5:19 faster This athlete4:58 faster -
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Individual Pro · Men1:02:2111/111Beat 90%
↑ 103 days after London 2024 0:24 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
3:20 faster on the clock, and the race was 2:56 faster for everyone, so 0:24 of it was this athlete.
The fieldCompare these two →2:56 faster This athlete3:20 faster -
London29 Nov 2024Individual Pro · Men1:05:4111/182Beat 94%
-
Birmingham25 Oct 2024Individual Open · Men1:05:0527/816Beat 97%
-
Glasgow11 Feb 2023Doubles Open · Men59:3823/343Beat 93%