Progress against the field
Between Cardiff 2025 and Glasgow 2026, Caroline Hogg lost 6:06 to the field.
The clock says 3:27 slower, but the races themselves got 2:39 quicker for everyone.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Open · Women, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
6 races · 6 events
-
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Individual Open · Women1:18:5933/324Beat 90%
↑ 285 days after Cardiff 2025 6:06 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
3:27 slower on the clock in a race that was 2:39 faster for everyone: 6:06 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:39 faster This athlete3:27 slower -
Madrid27 Nov 2025Doubles Open · Women1:15:00105/923Beat 89%
-
Cardiff30 May 2025Individual Open · Women1:15:32 PB67/587Beat 89%
-
Berlin16 May 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:07:22 PB100/528Beat 81%
↑ 65 days after Glasgow 2025, with Craig Hogg 0:24 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:24 better than the field: 5:14 faster on the clock, against 4:50 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →4:50 faster This pair5:14 faster -
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:12:36196/841Beat 77%
-
Dublin15 Nov 2024Doubles Open · Women1:11:00 PB51/560Beat 91%