Progress against the field
Jake Brown has gained 3:28 on the field from Birmingham 2025 to Rome 2026.
Over the same races everyone got 5:01 quicker, so 8:29 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
196 days between Glasgow 2026 and Rome 2026 is the longest gap compared here, and the second race was 1:12 behind the field.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
7 races · 7 events
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Doubles Pro · Men1:07:52 PB315/476Beat 34%
-
Rome23 Sep 2026Individual Open · Men1:24:47 PB540/1062Beat 49%
↑ 196 days after Glasgow 2026 1:12 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:07 faster on the clock, yet the race was 2:19 faster for everyone, so 1:12 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:19 faster This athlete1:07 faster -
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Individual Open · Men1:25:54315/613Beat 49%
↑ 97 days after London Excel 2025 7:47 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
The race was 0:20 slower for everyone and the clock still says 7:27 faster: 7:47 gained on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →0:20 slower This athlete7:27 faster -
Manchester21 Jan 2026Doubles Open · Men1:04:41 PB66/398Beat 83%
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Individual Open · Men1:33:212004/2771Beat 28%
↑ 43 days after Birmingham 2025 3:07 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:05 slower on the clock in a race that was 3:02 faster for everyone: 3:07 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →3:02 faster This athlete0:05 slower -
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Individual Open · Men1:33:161091/1600Beat 32%
-
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:26:10 PB567/861Beat 34%