Progress against the field
Between Manchester 2026 and Glasgow 2026, Charlotte McKenna lost 1:18 to the field.
The clock says 2:16 faster, but the races themselves got 3:34 quicker for everyone.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Open · Women, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
9 races · 8 events
-
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Individual Open · Women1:24:37240/1084Beat 78%
↑ 49 days after Manchester 2026 1:18 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:16 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 3:34 faster for everyone, which leaves this 1:18 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →3:34 faster This athlete2:16 faster -
Manchester21 Jan 2026Individual Open · Women1:26:5378/268Beat 71%
-
Warsaw12 Apr 2025Individual Open · Women1:21:00 PB69/317Beat 78%
-
Frankfurt14 Dec 2024Doubles Open · Women1:11:24 PB56/788Beat 93%
-
Paris9 Nov 2024Individual Open · Women1:32:16306/747Beat 59%
-
Birmingham25 Oct 2024Doubles Open · Women1:17:10223/973Beat 77%
-
Birmingham25 Oct 2024Relay · Women1:05:304/48Beat 92%
-
Sports Direct HYROX London4 May 2024Doubles Open · Women1:26:56811/1419Beat 43%
↑ 160 days after London 2023, with Amy Netherwood 9:36 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
7:43 slower on the clock in a race that was 1:53 faster for everyone: 9:36 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:53 faster This pair7:43 slower -
London26 Nov 2023Doubles Open · Women1:19:13342/1096Beat 69%