Progress against the field
From Glasgow 2026 to Birmingham 2026, Natalie Meek has moved with the field: what changed on the clock changed for everyone.
Over the same races everyone got 1:26 quicker, so 1:23 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Open · Women, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
6 races · 6 events
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Individual Open · Women1:24:38 PB66/279Beat 76%
↑ 234 days after Glasgow 2026 0:03 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
Moved with the field: 1:23 faster on the clock, against 1:26 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →1:26 faster This athlete1:23 faster -
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Individual Open · Women1:26:01277/1084Beat 74%
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Doubles Open · Women1:11:41 PB145/1599Beat 91%
↑ 43 days after Birmingham 2025, with Marian Meek-Jones 0:18 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:12 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 2:30 faster for everyone, which leaves this 0:18 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:30 faster This pair2:12 faster -
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Doubles Open · Women1:13:53139/1111Beat 88%
-
Belgium5 Apr 2025Doubles Open · Women1:15:2487/713Beat 88%
-
Birmingham25 Oct 2024Relay · Women1:23:1719/48Beat 60%