Progress against the field
Between Glasgow 2024 and London Excel 2025, Michelle OKelly lost 2:08 to the field.
The clock says 1:20 faster, but the races themselves got 3:28 quicker for everyone.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
6 races · 6 events
-
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Doubles Pro · Women1:20:23 PB19/34Beat 44%
-
Manchester21 Jan 2026Doubles Open · Women1:16:50 PB36/198Beat 82%
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Individual Open · Women1:31:15 PB632/1379Beat 54%
↑ 642 days after Glasgow 2024 2:08 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:20 faster on the clock, yet the race was 3:28 faster for everyone, so 2:08 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →3:28 faster This athlete1:20 faster -
Malaga21 Mar 2025Doubles Pro · Women1:22:0523/38Beat 40%
-
Manchester9 Nov 2024Doubles Open · Women1:27:29315/486Beat 35%
-
Glasgow2 Mar 2024Individual Open · Women1:32:35385/816Beat 53%