Progress against the field
Troy Pannett and William Higham have gained 3:36 on the field from Birmingham 2025 to Glasgow 2026.
The clock says 4:28 faster, but the races themselves got 0:52 quicker for everyone.
The largest gain on the field came from London Excel 2025 → Manchester 2026: 3:42 in 48 days.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Doubles Pro · Men, with William Higham, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
19 races · 11 events
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Doubles Open · Men58:0059/1035Beat 94%
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Doubles Open · Men55:436/605Beat 99%
-
Geneva9 Oct 2026Individual Pro · Men1:10:13115/478Beat 76%
-
Geneva9 Oct 2026Individual Open · Men1:04:25 PB29/1414Beat 98%
↑ 352 days after Birmingham 2025 0:42 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:26 faster on the clock, yet the race was 2:08 faster for everyone, so 0:42 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:08 faster This athlete1:26 faster -
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Doubles Pro · Men56:2321/202Beat 90%
↑ 49 days after Manchester 2026, with William Higham 1:20 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:20 behind the field: 0:22 slower on the clock, against 0:58 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →0:58 faster This pair0:22 slower -
Manchester21 Jan 2026Doubles Open · Men54:227/794Beat 99%
↑ 91 days after Birmingham 2025, with Tom Oxley 1:34 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:32 slower on the clock in a race that was 0:02 faster for everyone: 1:34 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →0:02 faster This pair1:32 slower -
Manchester21 Jan 2026Relay · Men51:563/69Beat 96%
-
Manchester21 Jan 2026Doubles Pro · Men56:01 PB2/50Beat 96%
↑ 48 days after London Excel 2025, with William Higham 3:42 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
The race was 1:50 slower for everyone and the clock still says 1:52 faster: 3:42 gained on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:50 slower This pair1:52 faster -
Manchester21 Jan 2026Individual Pro · Men1:03:56 PB12/193Beat 94%
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Doubles Pro · Men57:5343/312Beat 86%
↑ 43 days after Birmingham 2025, with William Higham 1:14 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:58 faster on the clock, and the race was 1:44 faster for everyone, so 1:14 of it was this pair.
The fieldCompare these two →1:44 faster This pair2:58 faster -
Dublin12 Nov 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:09:13 PB78/559Beat 86%
-
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Doubles Open · Men52:50 PB2/189Beat 99%
-
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Doubles Pro · Men1:00:5154/176Beat 69%
-
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Individual Open · Men1:05:5185/1600Beat 95%
-
Maastricht19 Sep 2025Doubles Open · Men53:403/821Beat 100%
-
Maastricht19 Sep 2025Individual Pro · Men1:09:0618/104Beat 83%
-
Cardiff30 May 2025Doubles Pro · Men59:417/63Beat 89%
-
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Doubles Open · Men55:4635/947Beat 96%
-
Birmingham25 Oct 2024Doubles Open · Men57:3611/875Beat 99%