Progress against the field
Between Glasgow 2023 and Glasgow 2025, John McLagan lost 5:12 to the field.
Over the same races everyone got 4:13 quicker, so 0:59 slower on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
10 races · 9 events
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Doubles Pro · Men1:04:49257/476Beat 46%
-
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:05:59 PB87/1198Beat 93%
-
Manchester21 Jan 2026Doubles Pro · Men1:03:07 PB104/279Beat 63%
-
Dublin12 Nov 2025Individual Pro · Men1:19:43 PB85/147Beat 42%
-
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Doubles Pro · Men1:14:35146/176Beat 17%
-
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Individual Open · Men1:14:14402/1588Beat 75%
↑ 760 days after Glasgow 2023 5:12 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:59 slower on the clock in a race that was 4:13 faster for everyone: 5:12 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →4:13 faster This athlete0:59 slower -
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Doubles Pro · Men1:11:15110/143Beat 23%
-
Manchester24 Jan 2025Individual Pro · Men1:27:52141/196Beat 28%
-
Glasgow2 Mar 2024Relay · Mixed1:33:1938/42Beat 10%
-
Glasgow11 Feb 2023Individual Open · Men1:13:15 PB183/974Beat 81%