Progress against the field
Between Birmingham 2024 and Manchester 2026, Natalie Morgan and Rachel Preston lost 0:26 to the field.
Over the same races everyone got 2:41 quicker, so 2:15 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
5 races · 5 events
-
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:09:01 PB144/1198Beat 88%
-
Manchester21 Jan 2026Doubles Open · Women1:08:38 PB54/1155Beat 95%
↑ 438 days after Manchester 2024, with Rachel Preston 0:34 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:34 better than the field: 1:33 faster on the clock, against 0:59 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →0:59 faster This pair1:33 faster -
London Excel4 Dec 2025Doubles Pro · Women1:06:53 PB19/222Beat 91%
-
Manchester9 Nov 2024Doubles Open · Women1:10:1144/486Beat 91%
↑ 15 days after Birmingham 2024, with Rachel Preston 1:00 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:42 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 1:42 faster for everyone, which leaves this 1:00 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:42 faster This pair0:42 faster -
Birmingham25 Oct 2024Doubles Open · Women1:10:5356/973Beat 94%