Progress against the field
From Glasgow 2025 to Birmingham 2026, the field gained 2:44 on Laura McLeod and Douglas Mcleod.
Over the same races everyone got 4:25 quicker, so 1:41 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
267 days between Glasgow 2025 and London Excel 2025 is the longest gap compared here, and the second race was 3:49 behind the field.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
7 races · 5 events
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:07:2368/549Beat 88%
↑ 234 days after Glasgow 2026, with Douglas Mcleod 2:56 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:51 slower on the clock in a race that was 2:05 faster for everyone: 2:56 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:05 faster This pair0:51 slower -
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:06:32 PB43/460Beat 91%
↑ 97 days after London Excel 2025, with Douglas Mcleod 4:01 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
The race was 0:20 slower for everyone and the clock still says 3:41 faster: 4:01 gained on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →0:20 slower This pair3:41 faster -
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Relay · Women1:09:2814/126Beat 89%
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:10:13284/1474Beat 81%
↑ 267 days after Glasgow 2025, with Douglas Mcleod 3:49 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
3:49 behind the field: 1:09 slower on the clock, against 2:40 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →2:40 faster This pair1:09 slower -
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Relay · Mixed1:00:4610/46Beat 78%
-
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:09:0497/861Beat 89%
-
Glasgow2 Mar 2024Relay · Mixed1:04:474/42Beat 91%