Progress against the field
Between Glasgow 2024 and Glasgow 2026, Fiona Watson and Angela McCabe lost 5:54 to the field.
Over the same races everyone got 5:51 quicker, so 0:03 slower on the clock looks better than it was.
375 days between Glasgow 2024 and Glasgow 2025 is the longest gap compared here, and the second race was 5:58 behind the field.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
7 races · 4 events
-
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Doubles Open · Women1:20:11363/1618Beat 78%
↑ 364 days after Glasgow 2025, with Angela McCabe 0:04 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:54 faster on the clock, and the race was 0:50 faster for everyone. Whatever changed, it changed for all of them.
The fieldCompare these two →0:50 faster This pair0:54 faster -
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Relay · Women1:31:1863/126Beat 50%
-
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Doubles Open · Women1:21:05239/796Beat 70%
↑ 375 days after Glasgow 2024, with Angela McCabe 5:58 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:57 slower on the clock in a race that was 5:01 faster for everyone: 5:58 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →5:01 faster This pair0:57 slower -
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Doubles Open · Women1:09:21 PB48/1051Beat 95%
-
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:27:29 PB599/861Beat 30%
-
Birmingham25 Oct 2024Individual Open · Women1:32:12 PB389/846Beat 54%
-
Glasgow2 Mar 2024Doubles Open · Women1:20:08220/1029Beat 79%