Progress against the field
Lorne Todd has dropped 1:20 behind the field from Cardiff 2025 to London Excel 2025.
The clock says 1:56 faster, but the races themselves got 3:16 quicker for everyone.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
12 races · 11 events
-
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Relay · Mixed58:238/119Beat 93%
-
Stockholm18 Dec 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:06:21108/1002Beat 89%
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Doubles Open · Women1:02:48 PB5/1599Beat 100%
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Individual Pro · Women1:14:04 PB57/315Beat 82%
↑ 188 days after Cardiff 2025 1:20 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:56 faster on the clock, yet the race was 3:16 faster for everyone, so 1:20 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →3:16 faster This athlete1:56 faster -
Cardiff30 May 2025Individual Pro · Women1:16:0012/74Beat 84%
-
Malaga21 Mar 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:01:42 PB43/693Beat 94%
-
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Doubles Pro · Women1:03:30 PB3/96Beat 97%
-
London29 Nov 2024Individual Open · Women1:10:42 PB8/940Beat 99%
-
Paris9 Nov 2024Doubles Open · Mixed1:05:4822/664Beat 97%
-
Glasgow2 Mar 2024Doubles Open · Women1:14:0478/1029Beat 92%
-
Birmingham21 Oct 2023Doubles Open · Mixed1:11:2455/352Beat 84%
-
Glasgow11 Feb 2023Doubles Open · Women1:14:4290/381Beat 76%