Progress against the field
From Glasgow 2025 to Birmingham 2025, Matthew Grieh got 3:55 faster than the field.
Over the same races everyone got 1:03 quicker, so 4:58 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Open · Men, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
7 races · 5 events
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Doubles Open · Men1:03:05103/605Beat 83%
-
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:02:11 PB13/500Beat 97%
-
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Doubles Open · Men59:20 PB71/1177Beat 94%
-
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Individual Open · Men1:07:26 PB115/1600Beat 93%
↑ 224 days after Glasgow 2025 3:55 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
3:55 better than the field: 4:58 faster on the clock, against 1:03 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →1:03 faster This athlete4:58 faster -
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:16:11302/841Beat 64%
↑ 138 days after Birmingham 2024, with Cleo Campbell 1:43 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:21 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 4:04 faster for everyone, which leaves this 1:43 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →4:04 faster This pair2:21 faster -
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Individual Open · Men1:12:24337/1445Beat 77%
-
Birmingham25 Oct 2024Doubles Open · Mixed1:18:32418/894Beat 53%