Progress against the field
From Manchester 2025 to London Excel 2025, Adam Wright has moved with the field: what changed on the clock changed for everyone.
Over the same races everyone got 3:58 quicker, so 3:50 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Open · Men, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
6 races · 5 events
-
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Doubles Open · Men1:30:55829/917Beat 10%
-
Manchester21 Jan 2026Doubles Open · Men1:05:12 PB212/794Beat 73%
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Doubles Open · Men1:13:171037/1815Beat 43%
↑ 43 days after Birmingham 2025, with Ryan Mcmillan 1:17 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:34 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 1:51 faster for everyone, which leaves this 1:17 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:51 faster This pair0:34 faster -
London Excel4 Dec 2025Individual Open · Men1:15:25 PB818/2779Beat 71%
↑ 314 days after Manchester 2025 0:08 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
3:50 faster on the clock, and the race was 3:58 faster for everyone. Whatever changed, it changed for all of them.
The fieldCompare these two →3:58 faster This athlete3:50 faster -
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Doubles Open · Men1:13:51646/1099Beat 41%
-
Manchester24 Jan 2025Individual Open · Men1:19:15490/1191Beat 59%