Progress against the field
Between Riga 2025 and London Excel 2025, Niamh O'Dwyer lost 6:31 to the field.
Over the same races everyone got 5:54 quicker, so 0:37 slower on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Open · Women, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
4 races · 4 events
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Individual Open · Women1:28:32721/1542Beat 53%
↑ 187 days after Riga 2025 6:31 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
6:31 behind the field: 0:37 slower on the clock, against 5:54 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →5:54 faster This athlete0:37 slower -
Rome26 Sep 2025Doubles Open · Women1:15:25 PB133/673Beat 80%
↑ 342 days after Milan 2024, with Katie Duggan 8:16 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
12:01 faster on the clock, and the race was 3:45 faster for everyone, so 8:16 of it was this pair.
The fieldCompare these two →3:45 faster This pair12:01 faster -
Riga31 May 2025Individual Open · Women1:27:55 PB108/291Beat 63%
-
Milan19 Oct 2024Doubles Open · Women1:27:26275/584Beat 53%