Progress against the field
From Birmingham 2024 to Glasgow 2025, the field gained 5:10 on Layla Bannard-Smith.
Over the same races everyone got 6:56 quicker, so 1:46 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
7 races · 5 events
-
Manchester21 Jan 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:14:2981/297Beat 73%
-
Manchester21 Jan 2026Doubles Pro · Women1:16:53 PB97/237Beat 59%
-
Manchester21 Jan 2026Relay · Women1:11:2412/71Beat 83%
-
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:06:00 PB60/889Beat 93%
-
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Individual Open · Women1:11:51 PB33/830Beat 96%
↑ 47 days after Manchester 2025 2:39 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:13 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 2:52 faster for everyone, which leaves this 2:39 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:52 faster This athlete0:13 faster -
Manchester24 Jan 2025Individual Open · Women1:12:0427/539Beat 95%
↑ 91 days after Birmingham 2024 2:31 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:33 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 4:04 faster for everyone, which leaves this 2:31 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →4:04 faster This athlete1:33 faster -
Birmingham25 Oct 2024Individual Open · Women1:13:3717/564Beat 97%