Progress against the field
From London Excel 2025 to Birmingham 2026, the field gained 0:48 on Ross Mcgrath and mike radford.
The clock says 0:04 faster, but the races themselves got 0:52 quicker for everyone.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
4 races · 4 events
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Doubles Open · Men1:09:16 PB477/1035Beat 54%
↑ 331 days after London Excel 2025, with mike radford 0:48 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:04 faster on the clock, yet the race was 0:52 faster for everyone, so 0:48 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →0:52 faster This pair0:04 faster -
Manchester21 Jan 2026Individual Open · Men1:12:05 PB87/529Beat 84%
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Doubles Open · Men1:09:20765/1815Beat 58%
-
Birmingham25 Oct 2024Doubles Open · Men1:09:41335/875Beat 62%