Progress against the field
Between London 2025 and Manchester 2026, Adam Rawcliffe and Glen Rawcliffe lost 13:17 to the field.
Over the same races everyone got 2:34 quicker, so 10:43 slower on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
5 races · 5 events
-
Manchester21 Jan 2026Doubles Open · Men1:32:28730/794Beat 8%
↑ 48 days after London Excel 2025, with Glen Rawcliffe 10:26 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
10:26 behind the field: 11:41 slower on the clock, against 1:15 slower for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →1:15 slower This pair11:41 slower -
London Excel4 Dec 2025Doubles Open · Men1:20:47 PB1658/2102Beat 21%
↑ 43 days after Birmingham 2025, with Glen Rawcliffe 1:58 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:58 better than the field: 3:49 faster on the clock, against 1:51 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →1:51 faster This pair3:49 faster -
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Doubles Open · Men1:24:36998/1177Beat 15%
↑ 172 days after London 2025, with Glen Rawcliffe 4:49 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:51 slower on the clock in a race that was 1:58 faster for everyone: 4:49 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:58 faster This pair2:51 slower -
London3 May 2025Doubles Open · Men1:21:45844/1010Beat 16%
-
Dublin15 Nov 2024Doubles Open · Men1:22:32551/638Beat 14%