Progress against the field
From Geneva 2025 to Geneva 2026, the field gained 1:43 on Thomas Decerf.
Over the same races everyone got 2:56 quicker, so 1:13 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
The longest gap between two races compared here, 266 days between St. Gallen 2026 and Geneva 2026, cost 1:01 on the field.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
4 races · 4 events
-
Geneva9 Oct 2026Individual Open · Men59:13 PB1/1414Beat 100%
↑ 266 days after St. Gallen 2026 1:01 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:28 faster on the clock, yet the race was 3:29 faster for everyone, so 1:01 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →3:29 faster This athlete2:28 faster -
St. Gallen16 Jan 2026Individual Open · Men1:01:419/1068Beat 99%
↑ 97 days after Geneva 2025 0:42 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:15 slower on the clock in a race that was 0:33 slower for everyone: 0:42 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →0:33 slower This athlete1:15 slower -
London Excel4 Dec 2025Doubles Open · Mixed58:12 PB14/1474Beat 99%
-
Geneva11 Oct 2025Individual Open · Men1:00:2611/1386Beat 99%