Progress against the field
From London 2025 to London Excel 2025, the field gained 2:41 on Tom Imlah.
Over the same races everyone got 3:02 quicker, so 0:21 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
188 days between Cardiff 2025 and London Excel 2025 is the longest gap compared here, and the second race was 2:41 behind the field.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Open · Men, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
13 races · 11 events
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:19:22 PB751/1474Beat 49%
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Individual Open · Men1:02:27 PB81/2779Beat 97%
↑ 188 days after Cardiff 2025 2:41 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:21 faster on the clock, yet the race was 4:02 faster for everyone, so 2:41 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →4:02 faster This athlete1:21 faster -
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Doubles Pro · Men58:41 PB15/102Beat 85%
-
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Individual Pro · Men1:15:1388/156Beat 44%
-
Gdansk12 Oct 2025Individual Pro · Men1:13:37 PB57/124Beat 54%
-
Cardiff30 May 2025Individual Open · Men1:03:4835/1401Beat 98%
↑ 27 days after London 2025 0:00 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
Moved with the field: 1:00 slower on the clock, against 1:00 slower for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →1:00 slower This athlete1:00 slower -
London3 May 2025Individual Open · Men1:02:4847/1917Beat 98%
-
Belgium5 Apr 2025Individual Open · Men1:03:5336/1638Beat 98%
↑ 71 days after Manchester 2025 1:20 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:33 faster on the clock, yet the race was 2:53 faster for everyone, so 1:20 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:53 faster This athlete1:33 faster -
Vienna22 Feb 2025Doubles Open · Men54:58 PB35/655Beat 95%
-
Manchester24 Jan 2025Individual Open · Men1:05:2680/1191Beat 93%
↑ 56 days after London 2024 0:01 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
Moved with the field: 2:19 faster on the clock, against 2:20 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →2:20 faster This athlete2:19 faster -
London29 Nov 2024Individual Open · Men1:07:45106/1637Beat 94%
↑ 20 days after Manchester 2024 0:21 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:21 better than the field: 0:40 faster on the clock, against 0:19 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →0:19 faster This athlete0:40 faster -
Manchester9 Nov 2024Individual Open · Men1:08:25159/1206Beat 87%
↑ 15 days after Birmingham 2024 0:20 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
3:54 faster on the clock, yet the race was 4:14 faster for everyone, so 0:20 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →4:14 faster This athlete3:54 faster -
Birmingham25 Oct 2024Individual Open · Men1:12:19251/1916Beat 87%