Progress against the field
Between London Excel 2025 and Birmingham 2026, Jake Nutt lost 1:24 to the field.
Over the same races everyone got 1:23 quicker, so 0:01 slower on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Open · Men, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
7 races · 6 events
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Individual Open · Men1:04:4025/359Beat 93%
↑ 331 days after London Excel 2025 1:24 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:01 slower on the clock in a race that was 1:23 faster for everyone: 1:24 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:23 faster This athlete0:01 slower -
London Excel4 Dec 2025Doubles Open · Men57:24 PB62/2102Beat 97%
↑ 188 days after Cardiff 2025, with Thomas O’Connor 0:47 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:30 faster on the clock, yet the race was 2:17 faster for everyone, so 0:47 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:17 faster This pair1:30 faster -
London Excel4 Dec 2025Individual Open · Men1:04:39 PB145/2779Beat 95%
-
Dublin12 Nov 2025Doubles Open · Men59:288/230Beat 97%
-
Cardiff30 May 2025Doubles Open · Men58:5456/563Beat 90%
-
Vienna22 Feb 2025Doubles Open · Men1:05:57212/655Beat 68%
-
Marseille7 Dec 2024Doubles Open · Men1:11:51343/729Beat 53%