Progress against the field
Dean Curran has dropped 5:09 behind the field from Glasgow 2024 to London Excel 2025.
Over the same races everyone got 9:12 quicker, so 4:03 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
267 days between Glasgow 2025 and London Excel 2025 is the longest gap compared here, and the second race was 3:45 behind the field.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
6 races · 5 events
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Individual Open · Men1:07:35278/2779Beat 90%
↑ 267 days after Glasgow 2025 3:45 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
3:45 behind the field: 0:13 slower on the clock, against 3:32 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →3:32 faster This athlete0:13 slower -
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Doubles Open · Men58:35 PB76/947Beat 92%
-
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Individual Open · Men1:07:22 PB123/1588Beat 92%
↑ 123 days after Paris 2024 0:32 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:28 faster on the clock, yet the race was 3:00 faster for everyone, so 0:32 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →3:00 faster This athlete2:28 faster -
Manchester24 Jan 2025Doubles Pro · Men1:05:18 PB54/122Beat 56%
-
Paris9 Nov 2024Individual Open · Men1:09:50140/1585Beat 91%
↑ 252 days after Glasgow 2024 0:52 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:48 faster on the clock, yet the race was 2:40 faster for everyone, so 0:52 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:40 faster This athlete1:48 faster -
Glasgow2 Mar 2024Individual Open · Men1:11:38208/1784Beat 88%