Progress against the field
Between London 2024 and Birmingham 2025, Chris Thomas lost 2:06 to the field.
Over the same races everyone got 4:54 quicker, so 2:48 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
6 races · 6 events
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:05:53 PB66/586Beat 89%
-
Cardiff29 Apr 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:21:56447/848Beat 47%
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Doubles Pro · Men55:58 PB24/263Beat 91%
-
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Individual Open · Men1:03:44 PB50/1600Beat 97%
↑ 224 days after Glasgow 2025 0:21 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:42 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 1:03 faster for everyone, which leaves this 0:21 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:03 faster This athlete0:42 faster -
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Individual Open · Men1:04:2668/1445Beat 95%
↑ 103 days after London 2024 1:45 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:06 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 3:51 faster for everyone, which leaves this 1:45 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →3:51 faster This athlete2:06 faster -
London29 Nov 2024Individual Open · Men1:06:3278/1637Beat 95%