Progress against the field
Between Birmingham 2023 and Berlin 2025, Rachel Keane and Rebecca Murphy lost 1:12 to the field.
Over the same races everyone got 8:45 quicker, so 7:33 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Doubles Open · Women, with Rebecca Murphy, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
5 races · 5 events
-
Cardiff29 Apr 2026Doubles Pro · Women1:21:24124/196Beat 37%
↑ 146 days after London Excel 2025, with Rebecca Murphy 3:59 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
5:23 slower on the clock in a race that was 1:24 slower for everyone: 3:59 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:24 slower This pair5:23 slower -
London Excel4 Dec 2025Doubles Pro · Women1:16:01 PB137/339Beat 60%
-
Berlin16 May 2025Doubles Open · Women1:12:25 PB226/1160Beat 81%
↑ 112 days after Manchester 2025, with Rebecca Murphy 1:35 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
4:44 faster on the clock, yet the race was 6:19 faster for everyone, so 1:35 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →6:19 faster This pair4:44 faster -
Manchester24 Jan 2025Doubles Open · Women1:17:09223/857Beat 74%
↑ 461 days after Birmingham 2023, with Rebecca Murphy 0:23 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:23 better than the field: 2:49 faster on the clock, against 2:26 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →2:26 faster This pair2:49 faster -
Birmingham21 Oct 2023Doubles Open · Women1:19:58156/460Beat 66%