Progress against the field
From Manchester 2025 to Rome 2025, the field gained 8:20 on Sarah Beamish.
Over the same races everyone got 6:15 quicker, so 2:05 slower on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
7 races · 7 events
-
Gdansk10 Oct 2026Doubles Open · Women1:15:39 PB93/653Beat 86%
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:14:14 PB471/1474Beat 68%
-
Dublin12 Nov 2025Doubles Open · Women1:32:28566/719Beat 21%
-
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Doubles Open · Women1:17:21207/904Beat 77%
-
Rome26 Sep 2025Individual Open · Women1:28:54129/315Beat 59%
↑ 146 days after London 2025 0:24 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:27 faster on the clock, and the race was 2:03 faster for everyone, so 0:24 of it was this athlete.
The fieldCompare these two →2:03 faster This athlete2:27 faster -
London3 May 2025Individual Open · Women1:31:21692/1368Beat 49%
↑ 99 days after Manchester 2025 8:44 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
8:44 behind the field: 4:32 slower on the clock, against 4:12 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →4:12 faster This athlete4:32 slower -
Manchester24 Jan 2025Individual Open · Women1:26:49 PB194/539Beat 64%