Progress against the field
Joanne Hills and Keeley Goodwin have gained 13:05 on the field from Manchester 2024 to Birmingham 2025.
Over the same races everyone got 6:50 quicker, so 19:55 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
The largest gain on the field came from Manchester 2024 → London 2024: 19:22 in 20 days.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
4 races · 4 events
-
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Doubles Open · Women1:31:41280/411Beat 32%
↑ 159 days after Berlin 2025, with Keeley Goodwin 1:37 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:25 slower on the clock in a race that was 0:48 slower for everyone: 1:37 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →0:48 slower This pair2:25 slower -
Berlin16 May 2025Doubles Open · Women1:29:16 PB960/1160Beat 17%
↑ 168 days after London 2024, with Keeley Goodwin 4:40 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:34 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 5:14 faster for everyone, which leaves this 4:40 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →5:14 faster This pair0:34 faster -
London29 Nov 2024Doubles Open · Women1:29:50359/517Beat 31%
↑ 20 days after Manchester 2024, with Keeley Goodwin 19:22 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
19:22 better than the field: 21:46 faster on the clock, against 2:24 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →2:24 faster This pair21:46 faster -
Manchester9 Nov 2024Doubles Open · Women1:51:36475/486Beat 2%