Progress against the field
Between Manchester 2023 and Manchester 2024, Andrew Greenhalgh lost 3:39 to the field.
Over the same races everyone got 9:28 quicker, so 5:49 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
5 races · 4 events
-
Manchester9 Nov 2024Doubles Open · Mixed1:00:34 PB18/410Beat 96%
-
Manchester9 Nov 2024Individual Open · Men1:07:11 PB129/1206Beat 89%
↑ 15 days after Birmingham 2024 3:39 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:35 faster on the clock, yet the race was 4:14 faster for everyone, so 3:39 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →4:14 faster This athlete0:35 faster -
Birmingham25 Oct 2024Individual Open · Men1:07:4649/816Beat 94%
↑ 636 days after Manchester 2023 0:00 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
Moved with the field: 5:14 faster on the clock, against 5:14 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →5:14 faster This athlete5:14 faster -
Birmingham21 Oct 2023Doubles Open · Mixed1:04:5415/352Beat 96%
-
Manchester28 Jan 2023Individual Open · Men1:13:0062/649Beat 90%