Progress against the field
Between Birmingham 2025 and Birmingham 2026, Jakub Riedel pulled 0:57 ahead of the field.
Over the same races everyone got 1:31 quicker, so 2:28 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
The biggest step was Stockholm 2026 → Tenerife 2026: 3:39 on the field in 78 days.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Pro · Men, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
25 races · 14 events
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Doubles Open · Mixed56:297/1159Beat 99%
↑ 57 days after Tenerife 2026, with Daisy Evans 1:27 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
6:47 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 8:14 faster for everyone, which leaves this 1:27 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →8:14 faster This pair6:47 faster -
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Individual Pro · Men1:00:27 PB35/693Beat 95%
↑ 57 days after Tenerife 2026 2:55 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
9:18 faster on the clock, and the race was 6:23 faster for everyone, so 2:55 of it was this athlete.
The fieldCompare these two →6:23 faster This athlete9:18 faster -
Tenerife4 Sep 2026Individual Pro · Men1:09:4537/271Beat 86%
↑ 78 days after Stockholm 2026 3:39 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
The race was 3:18 slower for everyone and the clock still says 0:21 faster: 3:39 gained on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →3:18 slower This athlete0:21 faster -
Tenerife4 Sep 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:03:165/220Beat 98%
-
Stockholm18 Jun 2026Doubles Pro · Men56:58196/704Beat 72%
-
Stockholm18 Jun 2026Individual Pro · Men1:10:06445/767Beat 42%
↑ 99 days after Glasgow 2026 4:59 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
4:59 behind the field: 7:08 slower on the clock, against 2:09 slower for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →2:09 slower This athlete7:08 slower -
Riga30 May 2026Doubles Open · Mixed58:4213/477Beat 97%
-
Cardiff29 Apr 2026Doubles Pro · Men59:2662/302Beat 80%
-
Cardiff29 Apr 2026Individual Open · Men57:55 PB4/913Beat 100%
↑ 49 days after Glasgow 2026 0:43 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:05 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 2:48 faster for everyone, which leaves this 0:43 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:48 faster This athlete2:05 faster -
Malaga16 Apr 2026Doubles Open · Mixed59:4213/546Beat 98%
↑ 85 days after Manchester 2026, with Daisy Evans 6:24 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
6:24 better than the field: 9:08 faster on the clock, against 2:44 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →2:44 faster This pair9:08 faster -
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Doubles Open · MixedDNF—
-
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Doubles Pro · Men57:0428/202Beat 86%
↑ 49 days after Manchester 2026, with Harry Edmondson 2:11 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:11 behind the field: 1:13 slower on the clock, against 0:58 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →0:58 faster This pair1:13 slower -
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Individual Open · Men1:00:0015/1452Beat 99%
↑ 97 days after London Excel 2025 0:54 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:54 behind the field: 1:14 slower on the clock, against 0:20 slower for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →0:20 slower This athlete1:14 slower -
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Individual Pro · Men1:02:5825/206Beat 88%
↑ 49 days after Manchester 2026 4:17 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:52 slower on the clock in a race that was 2:25 faster for everyone: 4:17 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:25 faster This athlete1:52 slower -
Manchester21 Jan 2026Doubles Open · Mixed55:43 PB3/297Beat 99%
-
Manchester21 Jan 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:08:50143/824Beat 83%
-
Manchester21 Jan 2026Doubles Pro · Men55:51 PB16/279Beat 94%
-
Manchester21 Jan 2026Individual Pro · Men1:01:062/193Beat 99%
↑ 55 days after Madrid 2025 1:37 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:21 faster on the clock in a race that was 0:16 slower for everyone: 1:37 better than the field.
The fieldCompare these two →0:16 slower This athlete1:21 faster -
London Excel4 Dec 2025Individual Open · Men58:4613/2771Beat 100%
↑ 43 days after Birmingham 2025 2:42 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:20 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 3:02 faster for everyone, which leaves this 2:42 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →3:02 faster This athlete0:20 faster -
Madrid27 Nov 2025Individual Pro · Men1:02:2710/299Beat 97%
↑ 36 days after Birmingham 2025 2:02 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
The race was 1:34 slower for everyone and the clock still says 0:28 faster: 2:02 gained on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:34 slower This athlete0:28 faster -
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Individual Open · Men59:0615/1821Beat 99%
↑ 145 days after Cardiff 2025 3:16 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
5:52 faster on the clock, and the race was 2:36 faster for everyone, so 3:16 of it was this athlete.
The fieldCompare these two →2:36 faster This athlete5:52 faster -
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Individual Pro · Men1:02:5512/141Beat 92%
-
Cardiff30 May 2025Individual Open · Men1:04:5856/1401Beat 96%
↑ 27 days after London 2025 1:49 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:49 faster on the clock in a race that was 1:00 slower for everyone: 1:49 better than the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:00 slower This athlete0:49 faster -
London3 May 2025Individual Open · Men1:05:47132/1917Beat 93%
-
Malaga21 Mar 2025Doubles Open · Men1:07:47 PB110/372Beat 70%