Progress against the field
From Cardiff 2025 to London Excel 2025, Ella Jones got 2:31 faster than the field.
Over the same races everyone got 2:14 quicker, so 4:45 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Open · Women, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
7 races · 7 events
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Doubles Open · Women1:18:21136/627Beat 78%
↑ 234 days after Glasgow 2026, with Laura Ashford 0:39 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:44 faster on the clock, yet the race was 3:23 faster for everyone, so 0:39 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →3:23 faster This pair2:44 faster -
Tenerife4 Sep 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:20:38 PB191/542Beat 65%
-
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Doubles Open · Women1:21:05414/1618Beat 74%
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Individual Open · Women1:29:20 PB752/1542Beat 51%
↑ 188 days after Cardiff 2025 2:31 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
4:45 faster on the clock, and the race was 2:14 faster for everyone, so 2:31 of it was this athlete.
The fieldCompare these two →2:14 faster This athlete4:45 faster -
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Doubles Open · Women1:14:22 PB133/904Beat 85%
-
Cardiff30 May 2025Individual Open · Women1:34:05253/400Beat 37%
-
Manchester9 Nov 2024Doubles Open · Women1:19:17186/486Beat 62%