Progress against the field
Between Shanghai 2025 and Beijing 2026, 成龙 于 lost 11:47 to the field.
The clock says 3:15 faster, but the races themselves got 15:02 quicker for everyone.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Open · Men, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
13 races · 7 events
-
Beijing10 Sep 2026Doubles Pro · Men55:10 PB8/226Beat 97%
-
Beijing10 Sep 2026Relay · Mixed52:571/260Beat 100%
-
Beijing10 Sep 2026Individual Open · Men58:261/665Beat 100%
↑ 26 days after Shenzhen 2026 0:49 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:49 better than the field: 3:57 faster on the clock, against 3:08 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →3:08 faster This athlete3:57 faster -
Beijing10 Sep 2026Doubles Open · Men52:15 PB1/287Beat 100%
↑ 68 days after Hangzhou 2026, with ·布尔力克 吐尔松江 4:07 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:19 faster on the clock, yet the race was 6:26 faster for everyone, so 4:07 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →6:26 faster This pair2:19 faster -
Shenzhen15 Aug 2026Individual Open · Men1:02:234/1284Beat 100%
↑ 14 days after Chengdu 2026 7:17 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
7:17 behind the field: 3:20 slower on the clock, against 3:57 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →3:57 faster This athlete3:20 slower -
Shenzhen15 Aug 2026Doubles Pro · Men57:449/254Beat 97%
↑ 14 days after Chengdu 2026, with 庆林 赵 1:54 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:11 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 2:05 faster for everyone, which leaves this 1:54 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:05 faster This pair0:11 faster -
Chengdu1 Aug 2026Doubles Pro · Men57:5510/182Beat 95%
-
Chengdu1 Aug 2026Individual Open · Men59:031/882Beat 100%
↑ 28 days after Hangzhou 2026 3:11 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:46 slower on the clock in a race that was 2:25 faster for everyone: 3:11 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:25 faster This athlete0:46 slower -
Hangzhou4 Jul 2026Doubles Open · Men54:341/483Beat 100%
-
Hangzhou4 Jul 2026Individual Open · Men58:17 PB1/760Beat 100%
↑ 49 days after Shanghai 2026 1:03 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:03 better than the field: 1:27 faster on the clock, against 0:24 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →0:24 faster This athlete1:27 faster -
Shanghai16 May 2026Individual Open · Men59:441/1447Beat 100%
↑ 56 days after Beijing I 2026 1:47 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:47 behind the field: 0:12 slower on the clock, against 1:35 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →1:35 faster This athlete0:12 slower -
Beijing I21 Mar 2026Individual Open · Men59:326/1267Beat 100%
↑ 119 days after Shanghai 2025 1:24 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:09 faster on the clock, yet the race was 3:33 faster for everyone, so 1:24 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →3:33 faster This athlete2:09 faster -
Shanghai22 Nov 2025Individual Open · Men1:01:419/914Beat 99%