Progress against the field
Between Shanghai 2025 and Shenzhen 2026, 燕华 杨 and JING XIAO lost 13:50 to the field.
Over the same races everyone got 6:27 quicker, so 7:23 slower on the clock looks better than it was.
The largest gain on the field came from Chengdu 2026 → Shenzhen 2026: 6:06 in 14 days.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Doubles Open · Men, with JING XIAO, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
18 races · 10 events
-
Beijing10 Sep 2026Doubles Pro · Men1:24:09 PB188/226Beat 17%
-
Beijing10 Sep 2026Doubles Open · Men1:18:11104/287Beat 64%
-
Beijing10 Sep 2026Relay · Mixed1:16:3460/260Beat 77%
-
Shenzhen15 Aug 2026Doubles Open · Men1:21:51343/759Beat 55%
↑ 14 days after Chengdu 2026, with JING XIAO 6:06 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
9:48 faster on the clock, and the race was 3:42 faster for everyone, so 6:06 of it was this pair.
The fieldCompare these two →3:42 faster This pair9:48 faster -
Shenzhen15 Aug 2026Individual Open · Men1:31:12525/1284Beat 59%
↑ 14 days after Chengdu 2026 4:08 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:11 slower on the clock in a race that was 3:57 faster for everyone: 4:08 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →3:57 faster This athlete0:11 slower -
Chengdu1 Aug 2026Doubles Open · Men1:31:39411/559Beat 27%
↑ 28 days after Hangzhou 2026, with JING XIAO 15:27 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
15:27 behind the field: 14:03 slower on the clock, against 1:24 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →1:24 faster This pair14:03 slower -
Chengdu1 Aug 2026Individual Open · Men1:31:01 PB323/882Beat 63%
↑ 343 days after Beijing 2025 0:00 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
Moved with the field: 4:14 faster on the clock, against 4:14 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →4:14 faster This athlete4:14 faster -
Hangzhou4 Jul 2026Doubles Open · Men1:17:36169/483Beat 65%
↑ 105 days after Beijing I 2026, with JING XIAO 1:22 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:22 behind the field: 0:39 slower on the clock, against 0:43 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →0:43 faster This pair0:39 slower -
Hangzhou4 Jul 2026Relay · Mixed1:26:49101/203Beat 50%
-
Stockholm18 Jun 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:13:44 PB670/825Beat 19%
-
Beijing I21 Mar 2026Relay · Mixed1:39:18214/289Beat 26%
-
Beijing I21 Mar 2026Doubles Open · Men1:16:57145/446Beat 68%
↑ 119 days after Shanghai 2025, with JING XIAO 3:07 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:29 slower on the clock in a race that was 0:38 faster for everyone: 3:07 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →0:38 faster This pair2:29 slower -
Shenzhen20 Dec 2025Relay · Mixed1:20:5675/212Beat 65%
-
Shenzhen20 Dec 2025Doubles Open · Men1:12:23 PB95/405Beat 77%
-
Shanghai22 Nov 2025Relay · Mixed1:22:26113/236Beat 52%
-
Shanghai22 Nov 2025Doubles Open · Men1:14:28110/388Beat 72%
-
Beijing23 Aug 2025Individual Open · Men1:35:15305/609Beat 50%
↑ 280 days after Beijing 2024 2:45 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:42 faster on the clock in a race that was 0:03 slower for everyone: 2:45 better than the field.
The fieldCompare these two →0:03 slower This athlete2:42 faster -
Beijing16 Nov 2024Individual Open · Men1:37:57124/232Beat 47%