Progress against the field
From Stockholm 2025 to Malaga 2026, the field gained 2:48 on Jack Mullane.
The clock says 3:22 faster, but the races themselves got 6:10 quicker for everyone.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Open · Men, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
26 races · 21 events
-
Istanbul1 Aug 2026Doubles Pro · Men54:3512/108Beat 89%
-
Malaga16 Apr 2026Individual Open · Men59:35 PB3/561Beat 100%
↑ 85 days after Manchester 2026 2:52 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
3:09 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 6:01 faster for everyone, which leaves this 2:52 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →6:01 faster This athlete3:09 faster -
Mechelen26 Mar 2026Doubles Pro · Men55:5140/493Beat 92%
-
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Doubles Pro · Men57:2030/202Beat 85%
↑ 97 days after London Excel 2025, with Conor Fitzgerald 0:00 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
Moved with the field: 0:04 slower on the clock, against 0:04 slower for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →0:04 slower This pair0:04 slower -
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Individual Pro · Men1:06:22 PB43/206Beat 79%
-
Bilbao7 Feb 2026Individual Pro · Men1:06:2351/285Beat 82%
-
Manchester21 Jan 2026Individual Open · Men1:02:4414/529Beat 97%
↑ 34 days after Stockholm 2025 0:04 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:13 faster on the clock, and the race was 0:09 faster for everyone. Whatever changed, it changed for all of them.
The fieldCompare these two →0:09 faster This athlete0:13 faster -
Stockholm18 Dec 2025Doubles Pro · Men57:3021/253Beat 92%
-
Stockholm18 Dec 2025Individual Open · Men1:02:5728/1315Beat 98%
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Doubles Pro · Men57:1637/312Beat 88%
↑ 22 days after Dublin 2025, with Conor Fitzgerald 0:19 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:19 better than the field: 2:20 faster on the clock, against 2:01 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →2:01 faster This pair2:20 faster -
Dublin12 Nov 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:18:23 PB244/559Beat 56%
-
Dublin12 Nov 2025Doubles Pro · Men59:3624/105Beat 77%
-
Dublin12 Nov 2025Individual Pro · Men1:12:1149/115Beat 57%
-
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Doubles Pro · Men58:2321/176Beat 88%
-
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Doubles Pro · Men58:2414/102Beat 86%
-
Hamburg2 Oct 2025Doubles Pro · Men55:216/72Beat 92%
-
Berlin16 May 2025Doubles Pro · Men59:1347/263Beat 82%
-
Katowice22 Feb 2025Doubles Open · Men57:3512/256Beat 95%
-
Frankfurt14 Dec 2024Doubles Open · Men57:457/700Beat 99%
-
Stockholm7 Dec 2024Doubles Open · Men57:02 PB8/240Beat 97%
-
London29 Nov 2024Individual Open · Men1:07:2294/1637Beat 94%
↑ 14 days after Dublin 2024 0:02 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:15 slower on the clock, and the race was 0:13 slower for everyone. Whatever changed, it changed for all of them.
The fieldCompare these two →0:13 slower This athlete0:15 slower -
Dublin15 Nov 2024Individual Open · Men1:07:0761/1221Beat 95%
↑ 20 days after Madrid 2024 0:19 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
5:16 faster on the clock, yet the race was 5:35 faster for everyone, so 0:19 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →5:35 faster This athlete5:16 faster -
Madrid26 Oct 2024Individual Open · Men1:12:23131/1066Beat 88%
-
Malaga13 Apr 2024Doubles Open · Men1:03:3675/332Beat 77%
-
Copenhagen23 Mar 2024Doubles Open · Men1:05:5492/291Beat 68%
-
BudapestDate unknownDoubles Pro · Men54:19 PB10/84Beat 88%