Progress against the field
Between Hong Kong 2025 and Shanghai 2025, Sasha Dalmonego lost 3:13 to the field.
Over the same races everyone got 7:34 quicker, so 4:21 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
11 races · 10 events
-
Beijing10 Sep 2026Doubles Pro · Women1:14:3439/165Beat 76%
-
Chengdu1 Aug 2026Individual Pro · Women1:31:36 PB56/100Beat 44%
-
Incheon15 May 2026Individual Pro · Women1:32:4944/94Beat 53%
-
Beijing I21 Mar 2026Doubles Pro · Women1:10:54 PB7/72Beat 90%
-
Osaka30 Jan 2026Individual Open · Women1:29:00153/619Beat 75%
-
Stockholm18 Dec 2025Individual Pro · Women1:34:08128/150Beat 15%
-
Shanghai22 Nov 2025Individual Open · Women1:22:15 PB66/426Beat 85%
↑ 91 days after Beijing 2025 3:13 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:56 faster on the clock, yet the race was 5:09 faster for everyone, so 3:13 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →5:09 faster This athlete1:56 faster -
Shanghai22 Nov 2025Doubles Pro · Women1:14:069/80Beat 89%
-
Beijing23 Aug 2025Individual Open · Women1:24:1155/314Beat 83%
↑ 28 days after Hong Kong 2025 0:00 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:25 faster on the clock, and the race was 2:25 faster for everyone. Whatever changed, it changed for all of them.
The fieldCompare these two →2:25 faster This athlete2:25 faster -
Hong Kong26 Jul 2025Individual Open · Women1:26:3673/523Beat 86%
-
Incheon17 May 2025Doubles Open · Women1:27:58 PB131/226Beat 42%