Progress against the field
From Vienna 2025 to Rotterdam 2026, the field gained 9:41 on Ronny Hofenboom.
The clock says 0:34 faster, but the races themselves got 10:15 quicker for everyone.
209 days between Vienna 2025 and Maastricht 2025 is the longest gap compared here, and the second race was 3:04 behind the field.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Open · Men, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
18 races · 18 events
-
Stockholm18 Jun 2026Doubles Pro · Men1:09:47599/704Beat 15%
-
Rotterdam15 Apr 2026Individual Open · Men1:15:39 PB115/570Beat 80%
↑ 124 days after Gent 2025 2:10 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:48 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 3:58 faster for everyone, which leaves this 2:10 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →3:58 faster This athlete1:48 faster -
Mechelen26 Mar 2026Doubles Pro · Men1:02:17 PB171/493Beat 65%
↑ 64 days after Amsterdam 2026, with Koen Daelewyn 0:02 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:45 faster on the clock, and the race was 0:43 faster for everyone. Whatever changed, it changed for all of them.
The fieldCompare these two →0:43 faster This pair0:45 faster -
Copenhagen13 Mar 2026Doubles Pro · Men1:10:36204/367Beat 44%
-
Amsterdam21 Jan 2026Doubles Pro · Men1:03:02101/298Beat 66%
-
Gent12 Dec 2025Individual Open · Men1:17:27398/1428Beat 72%
↑ 14 days after Utrecht 2025 5:03 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
5:03 behind the field: 0:33 slower on the clock, against 4:30 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →4:30 faster This athlete0:33 slower -
Utrecht28 Nov 2025Individual Open · Men1:16:54231/1337Beat 83%
↑ 70 days after Maastricht 2025 0:36 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
4:12 faster on the clock, and the race was 3:36 faster for everyone, so 0:36 of it was this athlete.
The fieldCompare these two →3:36 faster This athlete4:12 faster -
Maastricht19 Sep 2025Individual Open · Men1:21:06358/1352Beat 74%
↑ 209 days after Vienna 2025 3:04 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
3:04 behind the field: 4:53 slower on the clock, against 1:49 slower for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →1:49 slower This athlete4:53 slower -
Belgium5 Apr 2025Doubles Pro · Men1:04:3218/122Beat 85%
-
Vienna22 Feb 2025Individual Open · Men1:16:13596/1356Beat 56%
-
Frankfurt14 Dec 2024Doubles Pro · Men1:06:0853/137Beat 61%
-
Amsterdam10 Oct 2024Doubles Pro · Men1:06:5242/144Beat 71%
-
Rotterdam6 Apr 2024Doubles Open · Men1:09:03 PB126/722Beat 83%
↑ 77 days after Maastricht 2024, with Koen Daelewyn 0:34 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:34 better than the field: 2:44 faster on the clock, against 2:10 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →2:10 faster This pair2:44 faster -
Maastricht20 Jan 2024Doubles Open · Men1:11:4795/288Beat 67%
↑ 77 days after Amsterdam 2023, with Koen Daelewyn 6:21 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
10:45 faster on the clock, and the race was 4:24 faster for everyone, so 6:21 of it was this pair.
The fieldCompare these two →4:24 faster This pair10:45 faster -
Amsterdam4 Nov 2023Doubles Open · Men1:22:32272/411Beat 34%
-
Amsterdam22 Oct 2022Individual Open · Men1:29:25304/561Beat 46%
↑ 231 days after Maastricht 2022 0:46 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
3:32 faster on the clock, yet the race was 4:18 faster for everyone, so 0:46 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →4:18 faster This athlete3:32 faster -
Maastricht5 Mar 2022Individual Open · Men1:32:57169/243Beat 31%
-
World Championships NiceDate unknownDoubles Pro · Men1:09:09327/387Beat 16%