Progress against the field
From Manchester 2025 to Rome 2025, the field gained 3:08 on Emily Short and Callum Short.
Over the same races everyone got 3:53 quicker, so 0:45 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
9 races · 9 events
-
Valencia17 Oct 2026Individual Open · Women1:26:1752/205Beat 75%
-
Rimini28 May 2026Individual Open · Women1:40:40173/318Beat 46%
-
Manchester21 Jan 2026Doubles Pro · Women1:41:41 PB221/237Beat 7%
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Doubles Pro · Women1:43:03208/222Beat 6%
-
Rome26 Sep 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:00:0019/655Beat 97%
↑ 133 days after Berlin 2025, with Callum Short 1:01 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:55 slower on the clock in a race that was 1:54 slower for everyone: 1:01 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:54 slower This pair2:55 slower -
Berlin16 May 2025Doubles Open · Mixed57:05 PB19/892Beat 98%
↑ 112 days after Manchester 2025, with Callum Short 2:07 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
3:40 faster on the clock, yet the race was 5:47 faster for everyone, so 2:07 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →5:47 faster This pair3:40 faster -
London3 May 2025Doubles Open · Women1:04:33 PB10/1118Beat 99%
-
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Individual Open · Women1:14:30 PB64/830Beat 92%
-
Manchester24 Jan 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:00:4534/733Beat 95%