Progress against the field
Between Ottawa 2026 and Toronto 2026, Natasha Escott lost 1:02 to the field.
The clock says 0:23 faster, but the races themselves got 1:25 quicker for everyone.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Pro · Women, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
6 races · 6 events
-
Toronto1 Oct 2026Individual Pro · Women1:30:21 PB109/231Beat 53%
↑ 140 days after Ottawa 2026 1:02 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:23 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 1:25 faster for everyone, which leaves this 1:02 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:25 faster This athlete0:23 faster -
New York28 May 2026Doubles Open · Women1:17:34 PB96/1048Beat 91%
↑ 244 days after Boston 2025, with Sarah Waddell 5:14 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
The race was 0:28 slower for everyone and the clock still says 4:46 faster: 5:14 gained on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →0:28 slower This pair4:46 faster -
Ottawa14 May 2026Individual Pro · Women1:30:4462/114Beat 46%
-
Miami3 Apr 2026Individual Pro · Women1:32:58135/253Beat 47%
-
Toronto3 Oct 2025Individual Open · Women1:34:39 PB203/581Beat 65%
-
Boston26 Sep 2025Doubles Open · Women1:22:20460/1424Beat 68%