Progress against the field
Between Glasgow 2025 and Manchester 2026, Tom Gibson pulled 2:48 ahead of the field.
Over the same races everyone got 1:54 slower, so 0:54 faster on the clock looks worse than it was.
224 days between Glasgow 2025 and Birmingham 2025 is the longest gap compared here, and the second race was 1:30 better than the field.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Pro · Men, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
15 races · 13 events
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Individual Pro · Men1:03:4292/693Beat 87%
-
Berlin22 May 2026Individual Pro · Men1:04:2551/439Beat 88%
-
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Doubles Pro · Men54:2613/202Beat 94%
↑ 49 days after Manchester 2026, with Ryan Gibson 1:00 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:00 behind the field: 0:02 slower on the clock, against 0:58 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →0:58 faster This pair0:02 slower -
Manchester21 Jan 2026Doubles Pro · Men54:24 PB11/279Beat 96%
-
Manchester21 Jan 2026Individual Pro · Men1:07:0128/121Beat 77%
↑ 91 days after Birmingham 2025 1:18 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:34 faster on the clock in a race that was 0:44 slower for everyone: 1:18 better than the field.
The fieldCompare these two →0:44 slower This athlete0:34 faster -
London Excel4 Dec 2025Doubles Open · Men1:06:46 PB669/2102Beat 68%
-
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Doubles Pro · Men55:5412/176Beat 93%
-
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Individual Pro · Men1:07:3531/137Beat 77%
↑ 224 days after Glasgow 2025 1:30 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:20 faster on the clock in a race that was 1:10 slower for everyone: 1:30 better than the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:10 slower This athlete0:20 faster -
Malaga21 Mar 2025Individual Open · Men58:16 PB4/966Beat 100%
↑ 56 days after Manchester 2025 1:52 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:21 faster on the clock, yet the race was 2:13 faster for everyone, so 1:52 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:13 faster This athlete0:21 faster -
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Individual Pro · Men1:07:5540/111Beat 64%
-
Manchester24 Jan 2025Individual Open · Men58:378/1191Beat 99%
↑ 91 days after Birmingham 2024 0:36 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
3:16 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 3:52 faster for everyone, which leaves this 0:36 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →3:52 faster This athlete3:16 faster -
Dublin15 Nov 2024Doubles Pro · Men58:465/77Beat 94%
-
Birmingham25 Oct 2024Individual Open · Men1:01:5312/1916Beat 99%
-
Milan19 Oct 2024Doubles Open · Mixed1:30:32 PB537/768Beat 30%
-
World ChampionshipsDate unknownIndividual Pro · Men1:02:41 PB75/522Beat 86%