Progress against the field
Between London Excel 2025 and Birmingham 2026, Freddy O'Hare lost 2:05 to the field.
Over the same races everyone got 2:52 quicker, so 0:47 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
5 races · 5 events
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Individual Open · Men1:14:50 PB171/693Beat 75%
↑ 162 days after Berlin 2026 0:28 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:38 faster on the clock, and the race was 2:10 faster for everyone, so 0:28 of it was this athlete.
The fieldCompare these two →2:10 faster This athlete2:38 faster -
Berlin22 May 2026Individual Open · Men1:17:28212/686Beat 69%
↑ 23 days after Cardiff 2026 0:34 better than the field Slower on the clock, ahead of the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:29 slower on the clock, but the race was 1:03 slower for everyone, so this was 0:34 better than the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:03 slower This athlete0:29 slower -
Cardiff29 Apr 2026Individual Open · Men1:16:59151/466Beat 68%
↑ 146 days after London Excel 2025 3:07 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:22 slower on the clock in a race that was 1:45 faster for everyone: 3:07 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:45 faster This athlete1:22 slower -
London Excel4 Dec 2025Individual Open · Men1:15:37769/2771Beat 72%
-
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Doubles Open · Men1:04:38 PB276/1099Beat 75%