Progress against the field
ian vickers has dropped 0:23 behind the field from Glasgow 2025 to Warsaw 2026.
Over the same races everyone got 6:14 quicker, so 5:51 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Open · Men, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
6 races · 6 events
-
Berlin22 May 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:03:0730/530Beat 94%
↑ 371 days after Berlin 2025, with emily pretious 1:58 better than the field Slower on the clock, ahead of the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:37 slower on the clock, but the race was 2:35 slower for everyone, so this was 1:58 better than the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:35 slower This pair0:37 slower -
Warsaw16 Apr 2026Individual Open · Men1:03:44 PB27/555Beat 95%
↑ 400 days after Glasgow 2025 0:23 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
5:51 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 6:14 faster for everyone, which leaves this 0:23 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →6:14 faster This athlete5:51 faster -
Cardiff30 May 2025Doubles Open · Men59:22 PB64/563Beat 89%
-
Berlin16 May 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:02:30 PB83/892Beat 91%
-
London3 May 2025Relay · Men56:039/67Beat 87%
-
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Individual Open · Men1:09:35225/1445Beat 84%