Progress against the field
From Dublin 2025 to Glasgow 2026, the field gained 1:52 on Laura O’Connell and Linda O’Connell.
Over the same races everyone got 1:29 slower, so 3:21 slower on the clock looks worse than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
7 races · 7 events
-
Berlin22 May 2026Doubles Open · Women1:30:19513/777Beat 34%
-
Warsaw16 Apr 2026Doubles Open · Women1:27:1599/153Beat 35%
-
EMEA London Olympia24 Mar 2026Relay · Mixed1:19:5022/25Beat 12%
-
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Doubles Open · Women1:31:02903/1618Beat 44%
↑ 97 days after London Excel 2025, with Linda O’Connell 2:45 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
4:31 slower on the clock in a race that was 1:46 slower for everyone: 2:45 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:46 slower This pair4:31 slower -
St. Gallen16 Jan 2026Individual Open · Women1:42:32 PB485/725Beat 33%
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Doubles Open · Women1:26:31 PB1144/1887Beat 39%
↑ 22 days after Dublin 2025, with Linda O’Connell 0:53 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:10 faster on the clock, and the race was 0:17 faster for everyone, so 0:53 of it was this pair.
The fieldCompare these two →0:17 faster This pair1:10 faster -
Dublin12 Nov 2025Doubles Open · Women1:27:41157/262Beat 40%