Progress against the field
Between Heerenveen 2025 and Amsterdam 2026, Ids Elshof lost 3:07 to the field.
Over the same races everyone got 3:00 quicker, so 0:07 slower on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
6 races · 6 events
-
Maastricht19 Sep 2026Doubles Pro · Men58:1832/316Beat 90%
-
Heerenveen14 May 2026Doubles Pro · Men58:17 PB34/315Beat 89%
-
Amsterdam21 Jan 2026Individual Pro · Men1:08:1756/243Beat 77%
↑ 54 days after Utrecht 2025 2:25 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:11 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 4:36 faster for everyone, which leaves this 2:25 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →4:36 faster This athlete2:11 faster -
Utrecht28 Nov 2025Individual Pro · Men1:10:2826/215Beat 88%
↑ 203 days after Heerenveen 2025 0:42 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:18 slower on the clock in a race that was 1:36 slower for everyone: 0:42 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:36 slower This athlete2:18 slower -
Heerenveen9 May 2025Individual Pro · Men1:08:10 PB17/216Beat 92%
-
Rotterdam27 Feb 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:13:05 PB58/353Beat 84%