Progress against the field
Between London 2025 and Cardiff 2026, Emma Dodge and Laura Bucke lost 7:31 to the field.
Over the same races everyone got 0:30 slower, so 8:01 slower on the clock looks worse than it was.
215 days between London 2025 and London Excel 2025 is the longest gap compared here, and the second race was 2:14 behind the field.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
7 races · 7 events
-
Barcelona14 May 2026Doubles Pro · Women1:17:16104/200Beat 48%
-
Cardiff29 Apr 2026Doubles Pro · Women1:24:19137/196Beat 30%
↑ 146 days after London Excel 2025, with Laura Bucke 5:17 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
6:41 slower on the clock in a race that was 1:24 slower for everyone: 5:17 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:24 slower This pair6:41 slower -
London Excel4 Dec 2025Doubles Pro · Women1:17:38151/339Beat 56%
↑ 215 days after London 2025, with Laura Bucke 2:14 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:14 behind the field: 1:20 slower on the clock, against 0:54 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →0:54 faster This pair1:20 slower -
London3 May 2025Doubles Pro · Women1:16:18 PB101/233Beat 57%
-
Barcelona25 Apr 2025Individual Pro · Women1:43:00 PB146/162Beat 10%
-
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Doubles Pro · Women1:21:0979/150Beat 47%
-
London29 Nov 2024Doubles Open · Women1:28:22 PB690/1150Beat 40%