Progress against the field
Between Birmingham 2025 and Cardiff 2026, Rachel Walters pulled 4:13 ahead of the field.
The clock says 7:23 faster, but the races themselves got 3:10 quicker for everyone.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Open · Women, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
6 races · 5 events
-
Cardiff29 Apr 2026Doubles Open · Women1:29:15262/430Beat 39%
-
Cardiff29 Apr 2026Individual Open · Women1:20:45 PB60/389Beat 85%
↑ 189 days after Birmingham 2025 4:13 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
7:23 faster on the clock, and the race was 3:10 faster for everyone, so 4:13 of it was this athlete.
The fieldCompare these two →3:10 faster This athlete7:23 faster -
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Individual Open · Women1:28:08242/748Beat 68%
-
Cardiff30 May 2025Doubles Open · Women1:13:35 PB40/247Beat 84%
↑ 27 days after London 2025, with Rachel O'Keefe 0:44 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:24 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 1:08 faster for everyone, which leaves this 0:44 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:08 faster This pair0:24 faster -
London3 May 2025Doubles Open · Women1:13:59166/1118Beat 85%
-
Paris 118 Apr 2025Doubles Open · Women1:23:58175/328Beat 47%