Progress against the field
Between Cardiff 2025 and Birmingham 2026, Lee Forrester and Todd Fierro lost 3:52 to the field.
Over the same races everyone got 3:45 quicker, so 0:07 slower on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Doubles Pro · Men, with Todd Fierro, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
14 races · 14 events
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Doubles Pro · Men1:01:00154/476Beat 68%
↑ 185 days after Cardiff 2026, with Todd Fierro 2:44 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:27 slower on the clock in a race that was 2:17 faster for everyone: 2:44 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:17 faster This pair0:27 slower -
Gdansk10 Oct 2026Doubles Pro · Men1:03:1151/165Beat 69%
-
Cardiff29 Apr 2026Doubles Pro · Men1:00:3375/302Beat 75%
↑ 36 days after London Olympia 2026, with Todd Fierro 0:54 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:11 faster on the clock in a race that was 0:43 slower for everyone: 0:54 better than the field.
The fieldCompare these two →0:43 slower This pair0:11 faster -
London Olympia24 Mar 2026Doubles Pro · Men1:00:44108/484Beat 78%
↑ 110 days after London Excel 2025, with Todd Fierro 1:26 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:26 behind the field: 0:55 slower on the clock, against 0:31 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →0:31 faster This pair0:55 slower -
London Excel4 Dec 2025Doubles Pro · Men59:49 PB74/312Beat 76%
↑ 188 days after Cardiff 2025, with Todd Fierro 0:36 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:04 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 1:40 faster for everyone, which leaves this 0:36 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:40 faster This pair1:04 faster -
Cardiff30 May 2025Doubles Pro · Men1:00:5310/63Beat 84%
-
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Doubles Open · Men57:46 PB64/947Beat 93%
↑ 103 days after London 2024, with Todd Fierro 1:18 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:47 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 3:05 faster for everyone, which leaves this 1:18 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →3:05 faster This pair1:47 faster -
Manchester24 Jan 2025Individual Open · Men1:07:28 PB126/1191Beat 89%
↑ 713 days after Glasgow 2023 4:35 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:59 faster on the clock, yet the race was 5:34 faster for everyone, so 4:35 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →5:34 faster This athlete0:59 faster -
London29 Nov 2024Doubles Open · Men59:3330/444Beat 93%
-
Birmingham21 Oct 2023Relay · Men59:5012/33Beat 64%
-
Glasgow11 Feb 2023Individual Open · Men1:08:2785/974Beat 91%
↑ 378 days after Manchester 2022 6:35 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
6:35 better than the field: 13:30 faster on the clock, against 6:55 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →6:55 faster This athlete13:30 faster -
London19 Nov 2022Doubles Open · Men1:04:0750/343Beat 85%
-
Manchester29 Jan 2022Individual Open · Men1:21:57173/476Beat 64%
-
St. GallenDate unknownDoubles Pro · Men1:01:3211/103Beat 89%