Progress against the field
From Manchester 2026 to EMEA London Olympia 2026, Clare Rees got 1:23 faster than the field.
Over the same races everyone got 2:49 quicker, so 4:12 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Open · Women, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
6 races · 6 events
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Individual Pro · Women1:07:09 PB16/280Beat 94%
-
Cardiff29 Apr 2026Doubles Pro · Women1:02:04 PB7/196Beat 96%
-
London Olympia24 Mar 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:03:47 PB46/887Beat 95%
↑ 110 days after London Excel 2025, with Pete Rees 3:42 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
5:19 faster on the clock, and the race was 1:37 faster for everyone, so 3:42 of it was this pair.
The fieldCompare these two →1:37 faster This pair5:19 faster -
EMEA London Olympia24 Mar 2026Individual Open · Women1:02:09 PB17/507Beat 97%
↑ 62 days after Manchester 2026 1:23 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:23 better than the field: 4:12 faster on the clock, against 2:49 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →2:49 faster This athlete4:12 faster -
Manchester21 Jan 2026Individual Open · Women1:06:215/825Beat 99%
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:09:06224/1372Beat 84%