Progress against the field
From Glasgow 2024 to Birmingham 2026, the field gained 2:52 on Nathaniel Scott.
The clock says 10:44 faster, but the races themselves got 13:36 quicker for everyone.
283 days between Manchester 2026 and Birmingham 2026 is the longest gap compared here, and the second race was 5:21 better than the field.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Open · Men, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
11 races · 10 events
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Doubles Pro · Men1:00:58 PB153/476Beat 68%
↑ 221 days after London Olympia 2026, with Jack Williams 1:02 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:28 faster on the clock, and the race was 0:26 faster for everyone, so 1:02 of it was this pair.
The fieldCompare these two →0:26 faster This pair1:28 faster -
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Individual Open · Men1:11:34 PB151/677Beat 78%
↑ 283 days after Manchester 2026 5:21 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
9:05 faster on the clock, and the race was 3:44 faster for everyone, so 5:21 of it was this athlete.
The fieldCompare these two →3:44 faster This athlete9:05 faster -
Cardiff29 Apr 2026Doubles Open · Men58:56 PB20/522Beat 96%
-
London Olympia24 Mar 2026Doubles Pro · Men1:02:26145/484Beat 70%
-
Manchester21 Jan 2026Individual Open · Men1:20:39649/1463Beat 56%
↑ 48 days after London Excel 2025 0:32 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:32 behind the field: 1:39 slower on the clock, against 1:07 slower for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →1:07 slower This athlete1:39 slower -
London Excel4 Dec 2025Individual Open · Men1:19:001115/2779Beat 60%
↑ 43 days after Birmingham 2025 2:19 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:43 faster on the clock, yet the race was 3:02 faster for everyone, so 2:19 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →3:02 faster This athlete0:43 faster -
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Individual Open · Men1:19:43694/1821Beat 62%
↑ 172 days after London 2025 3:15 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
3:10 slower on the clock in a race that was 0:05 faster for everyone: 3:15 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →0:05 faster This athlete3:10 slower -
London3 May 2025Individual Open · Men1:16:33639/1917Beat 67%
↑ 190 days after Birmingham 2024 0:09 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
Moved with the field: 5:22 faster on the clock, against 5:31 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →5:31 faster This athlete5:22 faster -
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Doubles Pro · Men1:08:1096/143Beat 33%
-
Birmingham25 Oct 2024Individual Open · Men1:21:55772/1916Beat 60%
↑ 237 days after Glasgow 2024 1:58 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:23 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 2:21 faster for everyone, which leaves this 1:58 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:21 faster This athlete0:23 faster -
Glasgow2 Mar 2024Individual Open · Men1:22:18683/1784Beat 62%