Progress against the field
From Cardiff 2025 to London Excel 2025, the field gained 1:58 on Lucy Ackroyd.
Over the same races everyone got 2:14 quicker, so 0:16 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Open · Women, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
5 races · 5 events
-
Cardiff29 Apr 2026Doubles Open · Women1:16:11 PB82/399Beat 79%
-
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:14:52 PB305/1198Beat 75%
↑ 49 days after Manchester 2026, with Kyle Stobbs 2:34 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:34 better than the field: 4:59 faster on the clock, against 2:25 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →2:25 faster This pair4:59 faster -
Manchester21 Jan 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:19:51116/297Beat 61%
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Individual Open · Women1:29:54 PB782/1542Beat 49%
↑ 188 days after Cardiff 2025 1:58 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:16 faster on the clock, yet the race was 2:14 faster for everyone, so 1:58 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:14 faster This athlete0:16 faster -
Cardiff30 May 2025Individual Open · Women1:30:10295/587Beat 50%