Progress against the field
Between Glasgow 2025 and London Excel 2025, Nathan Owen lost 4:52 to the field.
The clock says 5:31 slower, but the races themselves got 0:39 slower for everyone.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Pro · Men, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
6 races · 6 events
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:19:45 PB551/1159Beat 53%
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Individual Pro · Men1:18:50280/462Beat 39%
↑ 267 days after Glasgow 2025 4:52 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
4:52 behind the field: 5:31 slower on the clock, against 0:39 slower for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →0:39 slower This athlete5:31 slower -
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Individual Open · Men1:16:01461/1821Beat 75%
↑ 327 days after London 2024 5:36 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:20 slower on the clock in a race that was 3:16 faster for everyone: 5:36 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →3:16 faster This athlete2:20 slower -
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Individual Pro · Men1:13:19 PB65/134Beat 52%
-
London29 Nov 2024Individual Open · Men1:13:41 PB285/1637Beat 83%
-
Amsterdam10 Oct 2024Individual Pro · Men1:20:3271/177Beat 60%