Progress against the field
From Birmingham 2024 to Dublin 2025, the field gained 18:55 on Keeley Whitcombe and Dani Duffy.
Over the same races everyone got 8:53 quicker, so 10:02 slower on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
7 races · 7 events
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Relay · Women1:23:0550/87Beat 43%
-
Cardiff29 Apr 2026Doubles Open · Women1:24:29397/862Beat 54%
-
Dublin12 Nov 2025Doubles Open · Women1:32:58399/525Beat 24%
↑ 193 days after London 2025, with Dani Duffy 0:10 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:43 faster on the clock, yet the race was 2:53 faster for everyone, so 0:10 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:53 faster This pair2:43 faster -
London3 May 2025Doubles Open · Women1:35:41916/1118Beat 18%
↑ 99 days after Manchester 2025, with Dani Duffy 7:00 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
3:32 slower on the clock in a race that was 3:28 faster for everyone: 7:00 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →3:28 faster This pair3:32 slower -
Manchester24 Jan 2025Doubles Open · Women1:32:09632/857Beat 26%
↑ 91 days after Birmingham 2024, with Dani Duffy 11:45 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
11:45 behind the field: 9:13 slower on the clock, against 2:32 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →2:32 faster This pair9:13 slower -
Manchester9 Nov 2024Doubles Open · Women1:17:14 PB129/486Beat 74%
-
Birmingham25 Oct 2024Doubles Open · Women1:22:56431/973Beat 56%